Some of EPR's diverse capabilities and engagements are highlighted below. This list is not exclusive, but is representative of the types of work performed in the past. Your immedite concerns may not be specifically identified below, but EPR is exceptional at diagnosing and affecting outcome oriented solutions to complex problems. On a more routine basis, EPR services cover the full gamet of construction management, commissioning, and quality programs for heavy industrial construction projects.
|Mechanical Completion Verification and Claim Development
A freshly completed facility exhibited concerning operational instability. EPR initially assessed the $3.4B plant and determined it suffered from poor construction and ineffective commissioning practices. EPR conceptualized and instituted a system to evaluate the as-found detailed defects in a repeatable, scalable, and standards based program. The effort comprised of about 3,000,000 defects, including about 100 very serious commissioning related lapses, totaling a ~$400mm claim to the EPC Contractor. Managed remediation of many critical defects and an overall facility perfromance improvement program.
Provided most of the commissioning personnel for a 40MW greenfield biomass plant. Included routine field commissioning for mechanical, electrical, I&C, and other equipment specialties. This support continued into early operations and involved many plant upgrades and evolutions during the early O&M wring-out period.
Supplemented an owners team to complete the commissioning of an LNG terminal. Included routine process reviews and field completion oversight. Prepared facility for first-delivery of LNG at the offload pier/berth.
Provided the systems, personnel, supervision, and know-how to create codes/standards/specification punchilst in a nearly completed greenfield coal plant (2x600MW). Approximately a dozen different disciplines were evaluated and the structured/scalable process invented by EPR yielded a fully defensible list of approximately 2,000,000 defects. The priced and prioritized list was used by the client to negotiate improved completion of important details and commercial leverage needed to favorably close-out the project with the EPC Contractor. The EPR team remained engaged to oversee the repairs and completion of priority items.
|Biomass OEM Representative
Provided personnel to oversee field operations and tuning of a biomass co-generation boiler at a greenfield ethanol facility. Involved working with unique constraints during late-stage commissioning due to the close-coupled nature of the ethanol process plant.
Created an area assessment approach to delivering a rich content, +/-30% priced, notification letters of deficiencies. Notifications of approximately 600 areas in a large greenfield coal plant provided an opening basis for a discussion with the EPC Contractor about the deficient nature of their performance and the ROM (rough order of magnitude) commercial value to remedy the concerns. EPR's work was critcial in getting commercial closure on the project.
Provided highly experienced electrical engineering review and resolution of serious issues with greenfield facility design that showed up very late in the construction process. Worked with internal design staff and owner's commissioning team to affect the changes in an environment that was unusually "defensive"... Resulted in pragmatic but technically acurate changes that did not delay commissioning or the project end date.
Mobilized team and systems to Asia to perform EPR's unique large-scale punchlist on a greeefield CCGT facility. Engaegment resulted in about 100,000 defects that were referenced to the project requirements. This service was performed with the second beta version of what would later become SLATE.
EPC Contractor was having difficulty completing electrical and piping work at a greenfield CCGT plant. Owner was concerned and EPR mobilized commissioning manager, electrical and piping construction supervision, and electrical commissioning lead to supplement existing owner's team and proactively assist contractor to focus on completion and problem resolution.
|Pipeline Quality Auditing
Canadian oil and gas transportation company implemented a construction quality program to improve the construction details thereby reducing risk on their greenfield pipeline projects. EPR principals had been invovled in a similarly unique construction auditing programs in the past. The auditors needed to support this program were not readily available, so EPR developed a competency based metric to evaluate candidates and was very successful providing this client with exceptional auditors.
Provided support personnel to an owner's commissioning team in Vietnam on a greenfield 2x600MW coal plant. Focused largely on system completion and oversight of EPC contractor commissioning of same systems. Included ash systems and ash pond facilities.
|Construction, Safety, and Commissioning Oversight
Support personnel to owner's team at a greenfield 2x660 supercritical coal plant. One aspect included direct involvement in lifting and rigging safety to prevent injury and fatalities. Supported constrcution manager with field superintendents to guide and oversee various contractor erection activities. Turnover support and work to completion activities in support of commissioning of plant to achieve project schedule objectives.
Evaluated project risk of a 1,000MW CCGT that was early in construction and headed for a bankruptcy process. Presented benchmark construction costs, quality concerns, execution strategy options with cost weighted risks, schedule review and identified "restart" risk of key suppliers, among other metrics.
|Source Inspections (Various)
Provided CTG shop inspection services on two new units for a Canadian client. Provided inspection report that detailed observations, witness points observed, among other details. Similarly, EPR has been involved in receiving inspection of 65km of 8" Chinese manufactured piping, after a competitors shop inspectors indicated among months of periodic shop reports that everything was in conformance. However, the inspections EPR performed indicated that essentially all the coatings that were supposedly applied to the contract codes and standards were in-fact vastly defective and needed to be removed and re-applied.
Developed methodology to benchmark a 3rd-party operating company at a new plant based on a known set of operations and maintenance standards (EPRI). Provided a written assessment to the owner which was the basis of a strategic change in O&M approach that led to vastly improved conduct of operations.
Hired by an existing client to evaluate their internal performance on a complex chemical plant addition. Perfomed detailed baseline review, a cumulative impact assessment due to tremendous change activity that affected progress, a litigation strategy, and change order review of a subcontractor dismissed for poor performance.